Ok, so there's a lot of people in the US that are a minority of some kind. Black, Asian, Mexican, Trans, Non-Binary, Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual, etc. But they're not the huge majority of the country. And, just like the rest of us, they like entertainment. They like rooting for heroes. And relating to people. But why do people think they can't relate to others not of their race/gender/sexuality? Why do people think that only people of one race/gender/sexuality should write/create people of that race/gender/sexuality? Because if that were true, there would be more straight white men in media. Characters like Harry Potter, Black Panther, and just about any made-up alien characters would not exist if that were a mentality to live by. Because we have no idea what alien life is like. I'm an autistic white male bisexual, and I never looked up to heroes in the traditional way. When I enjoyed a main character, it was because I could relate to them, like Scott Pilgrim from . . . . Scott Pilgrim and Dandy from Space Dandy. I didn't care that they weren't bisexual and/or autistic like me. I enjoyed them because it was fun to see how they go through their journeys. The closest I ever had to a "hero" was the Japanese artists behind Pokemon and Star Force Mega Man, like Ken Sugimori and Shingo Adachi respectively. And I never kissed the ground they walked on. I don't stalk them, and I don't know a god damn thing about their personal lives. I just like them because of their work, that I strive to live up to. I love music by just about any type of race and nationality, including Japanese and African-American music. Do you really think that Africans should be the only ones to enjoy the likes of Barry White, Earth, Wind and Fire or Jimi Hendrix? Or that the Japanese should be the only ones to like whatever great anime opening they put out? I really don't think so. At all. Now let's talk about characters made for the sake of "representation". Black Panther and Luke Cage were made to represent Africans. Shang Chi, Mandarin and Ryan Choi (the 4th Atom) were made to represent Asians. And lord knows how many woman characters were made to represent females. But do they accurately reflect the races and genders they are? No. Not all white people are mean. Tom Holland, Chris Pratt and Robert Downey Jr would like to say hi to you. Not all black people are nice. OJ Simpson and Bill Cosby would like to hurt you. Not all woman are submissive. Brie Larson and Scarlett Johansson come to mind. And certainly not all trans people are good. Lily Peet (now Lily Orchard) and "Jessica" Yaniv come to mind. And so does Chris-Chan. Although the latter 2 are not really trans, but still. But should we judge one type of person just by one specimen? No. Absolutely not. People of one type of thing can range greatly in personality and skill. When you make a character for a story, and prioritize them being a "representation" instead of being a compelling character, you partake in a very harmful thing known as tokenization. Just making a character to represent a race, gender or sexuality means you only put them there for social brownie points. If you make a character for a story, they should add to it or help it move along. Not just be there to represent stereotypes. Because in good stories: Good characterization >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Representation" Another way this is harmful, especially on the SJW side of things: the stories who promote one race, gender or sexuality as being superior through a Mary Sue main character of that gender, race and/or sexuality lead to very horrible products. And in turn, low sales. And in turn, dead and bankrupt companies. Because nobody wants to follow a Mary Sue character. They want to enjoy an interesting character. This type of storytelling is also harmful, because it can potentially brainwash young, impressionable minds into thinking that minority races are inherently superior. When they are really not. Which can lead to disastrous and grave consequences in the near future. If the future depends on a team of people to save it, who should be the ones to do it? A team of highly-trained, professional people with great merit? Or a diverse team of people consisting of every combination of things except for a straight, white man, with no merit? The answer should be obvious. But that's not to say that minorities can't do great things. Usain Bolt, a Jamaican, was one of the greatest sprinters of all time. Carly Patterson, a woman, won in Gymnastics in the 2004 Olympics. Anyone, minority or nor, can do great things if they put their mind to it. But those great things shouldn't be about their race, gender or sexuality.